RESUMOAo elaborar a Constituição Fe

RESUMO



Ao elaborar a Constituição Federal de 1988 a assembléia constituinte decidiu-se por manter a tradição do direito constitucional pátrio, prevendo a possibilidade da existência da prisão preventiva. Essa prisão se originou antes da chamada prisão-pena, e tem possui como marco divisor entre elas a existência de sentença condenatória irrecorrível. No entanto, para sua aplicação a Constituição impôs limites à prisão processual, vez que ao aplacá-la são violados direitos e princípios fundamentais constitucionalmente previstos de altíssima relevância. O que se propõe neste trabalho é uma análise do instituto em comento, principalmente, sua utilização na Lei 11.340/06 visando exteriorizar as questões mais controversas de sua aplicação. Não se trata de ofensiva contra o instituto acautelatório, mas de estabelecer elementos suficientes para que seja desenvolvida uma nova concepção jurídica acerca do tema, concepção essa, que reconheça a regra da Nova ordem constitucional, a manutenção da liberdade.

Resultados (Inglês) 1:

summary



when preparing the federal constitution of 1988 to constituent assembly decided to uphold the tradition of constitutional paternal, foreseeing the possibility of the existence of the detention. this arrest originated before the call-prison sentence, and has features such as watershed including the existence of sentence appealed. however,its application to the constitution imposed limits on procedural arrest, time to placate her rights are violated fundamental principles and constitutionally set of high relevance. what is proposed in this paper is an analysis of the institute under discussion, especially their use in law 11.340/06 order to output the most controversial issues of its application.it is not offensive against the institute acautelatório, but sufficient evidence to establish that it developed a new legal conception of the subject, this design, which recognizes the rule of the new constitutional order, the maintenance of liberty.

Resultados (Inglês) 2:

SUMMARY



in drafting the 1988 Federal Constitution the constituent Assembly decided to maintain the tradition of constitutional law of the homeland, anticipating the possibility of the existence of the pre-trial detention. This originated before the prison called prison-sentence, and has features such as marco divider between them the existence of enforceable judgment is not actionable. However, for its implementation the Constitution imposed limits to the arrest procedure, time to placate her fundamental rights and principles are violated constitutionally provided for of the highest relevance. What is proposed in this paper is an analysis of the Institute in comment, especially their use in Law 11,340/06 aiming to externalize the more controversial issues of its application. It is not a question of offensive against the acautelatório Institute, but to establish sufficient evidence for it to be developed a new legal concept on the subject, this conception, that recognizes the rule of the new constitutional order, the maintenance of freedom.

Resultados (Inglês) 3:

SUMMARY



When drafting the Federal Constitution of 1988 the constituent assembly decided to continue the tradition of constitutional law parental rights, providing the possibility of the existence of preventive detention. This prison originated before the call prison-worth, and has features such as march splitter between them the existence of final judgment appealed. However,For its application to the Constitution has imposed limits on the prison procedural, rather than to mitigate it are violated fundamental rights and principles constitutionally provided for very high relevance. What is proposed in this work is an analysis of the institute in wealthiest, mainly, their use in Law 11,340 /06 aimed at expressing the more controversial issues of its application.This is not offensive against the institute acautelatorio, but to establish sufficient elements to be developed a new legal conception of the subject, this design, which recognize the rule of the New constitutional order, the maintenance of freedom.