Concerning to the information of th

Concerning to the information of the recent activity of the process that we appeal about the decision of the first instance judgment that not appreciate the evidence properly, we came to inform you that the State Court who receive the appeal, scheduled the trial to August 11th, 2016.
Thereby we present to the judges designated to appreciate the appeal, memorials of the case, with the intention to prove the due credit of the receipt of the goods.
After that, in the trial day, we did a oral arguments with the prospect of appreciation by the judges to decide in our favor, but without success and against our expectations, claiming that the documents attached were not sufficient to prove the defendant’s default, understanding that there was no estoppel and not proving the delivery of the goods, leaving proven the mistake.

On this, we have two options:

1) The first one, is provide a special appeal to the STJ (Supreme Court of Justice), claiming the divergence of Jurisprudence, because there are several Jurisprudential understandings in our favor, contrary to the decision of the judge.
For that is necessary to pay costs, according to the Court Costs List annexed.


2) Or file an ordinary collection action with all the documents that we have, in an attempt to recover the default credit.


Anyway, even if you gentleman prefer to the option of file a ordinary collection action, we recommend file of the special appeal to the Supreme Court of Justice on the understanding of the jurisprudence in accordance with our request , there is a great chance of reverse the sentence.

If you have any further question, do not hesitate to ask us.

Best regards,

Resultados (Inglês) 1:

Concerning to the information of the recent activity of the process that we appeal about the decision of the first instance judgment that do not appreciate the evidence properly, we came to inform you that the State Court who receive the appeal, scheduled the trial to August 11th, 2016. Thereby we present to the judges designated to appreciate the appeal, memorials of the case, with the intention to prove the due credit of the receipt of the goods.After that, in the trial day, we did the oral arguments with the prospect of appreciation by the judges to decide in our favour, but without success and against our expectations, claiming that the documents attached were not sufficient to prove the defendant's default, understanding that there was on estoppel and not proving the delivery of the goods, leaving proven the mistake.On this, we have two options:1) The first one, is provide a special appeal to the SUPREME COURT (Supreme Court of Justice), claiming the divergence of Jurisprudence, because there are several Jurisprudential understandings in our favor, contrary to the decision of the judge. For that is necessary to pay costs, according to the Court Costs List annexed.2) Or file an ordinary collection action with all the documents that we have, in an attempt to recover the default credit.Anyway, even if you gentlemen prefer to the option of file the ordinary collection action, we recommend file of the special appeal to the Supreme Court of Justice on the understanding of the jurisprudence in accordance with our request, there is a great chance of reverse the sentence.If you have any further question, do not hesitate to ask us.Best regards,

Resultados (Inglês) 2:

Regarding to the information of the recent activity of the process That We appeal about the decision of the first instance judgment que not appreciate the evidence enquiry.c, we came to inform you que the State Court who receive the appeal, scheduled the trial to August 11th, 2016.
Thereby we present to the judges designated to appreciate the appeal, memorials of the case, with the intention to prove the due credit of the receipt of the goods.
After que, in the trial day, we did the oral arguments with the prospect of appreciation by the judges to decide in our favor, but without success and against our expectations, claiming que the documents attached Were not sufficient to prove the defendant's default, understanding que there was the estoppel and not proving the delivery of the goods, leaving proven the mistake.

on this, we have two options:

1) the first one, is Provide a special appeal to the Supreme Court (Supreme Court of Justice), claiming the divergence of Jurisprudence, because there are Several jurisprudential understandings in our favor, contrary to the decision of the judge.
For That is Necessary to pay costs, According to the Court costs List annexed.


2) Or file an ordinary collection action all with the documents That We have, in an attempt to recover the default credit.


Anyway, even if you gentleman prefer to the option of file the ordinary collection action, we recommend file of the special appeal to the Supreme Court of Justice on the understanding of the jurisprudence in Accordance with our request, there is a great chance of reverse the sentence.

if you have any further question, do not hesitate to ask us.

Best regards,

Resultados (Inglês) 3:

Concerning to the information of the recent activity of the process that we appeal about the decision of the first instance judgment that not appreciate the evidence properly, we came to inform you that the state court who receive the appeal, the trial scheduled to August 11th, 2016.Thereby we present to the judges designated to appreciate the appeal, monuments of the case, with the intention to prove the due credit of the receipt of the goods.After that, in the trial day, we did the oral arguments with the prospect of appreciation by the judges to decide in our favour, but without success and against our expectations, claiming that the documents attached were not sufficient to prove the defendant"s default, understanding that there was no Estoppel and not proving the delivery of the goods, leaving proven the mistake.On this, we have two options:1) the first one is provide a special appeal to the Supreme Court (the Supreme Court of Justice), claiming the divergence of jurisprudence, because there are several jurisprudential understandings in our favor, contrary to the decision of the judge.For that is necessary to pay costs, according to the court costs list annexed.2) or file an ordinary collection action with all the documents that we have, in an attempt to recover the default credit.Anyway, even if you gentlemen prefer to the option of file the ordinary collection action, we recommend file of the special appeal to the Supreme Court of justice on the understanding of the jurisprudence in accordance with our request, there is a great chance of reverse the sentence.If you have any further question, do not hesitate to ask us.Best regards.